However, this is very likely to violate the Terms of Service. Of course we can manually create several YouTube accounts, for example, to cover the infield with video surveillance. on the server.įor one RTSP stream we need one YouTube account that will accept the stream but what should we do if we have not one but a lot of cameras? So, to convert RTSP to RTMPS, we do this in a headless way (without using the UI), i.e. Facebook refused RTMP stream but fortunately left RTMPS alone. HTTP is brutally persecuted, and its fate has befallen other protocols that don't have the S letter in the end - which means Secure. Why RTMPS, not RTMP? As you know, non-security protocols are dying out. To do this, we will need to take the RTSP stream and convert it to the RTMPS stream that YouTube accepts. Let's say we want to take an ordinary street IP camera that sends an H.264 stream over RTSP and redirect it to YouTube. Anyway, the feature doesn't exist but we would like to change this and help YouTube to make their viewers happy. By the way, there is another assumption: streams from IP cameras are the true evil for YouTube because they have a little more than zero viewers, so they can't give the platform a million ad views. Just a reminder: there were some cases when the quality of streaming was deteriorated and restricted to 240p. This way, people don't stream static video surveillance of their doorways on YouTube and don't ruin its channels, which, as it turned out in the pandemic, are not limitless at all. Perhaps this isn't done by a chance, but on the basis of the true pragmatics. As you know, YouTube doesn't have a feature for capturing an RTSP stream.

Best free multiple ip camera recorder